Google analytics Link

Soft Sediment Recumbent Folds in Cross-Bedded Sandstones

Orford and Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia

 

Channel

Roberto Weinberg
Monash University, Australia

 

 

Copyright 2004-2011 by Roberto Weinberg. All rights reserved. Unlimited permission to copy or use is hereby granted for non-profit driven enterprise, subject to inclusion of this copyright notice and acknowledgment of the source URL: users.monash.edu.au/~weinberg.

 

I would very much appreciate an email stating how this material will be used: Roberto Weinberg, Monash University, Australia. Thanks, RW.

 

DISCLAIMER. The material on this website has not undergone the scrutiny of Monash University and does not conform to its corporate web design. It is entirely based on a free-spritied, curiosity-driven research effort by the author, and therefore in no way expresses the official position of the University.

 

 

cross beds This page covers a set of observations on sandstones from the Stapleton Beach, 2 km south of Orford, Eastern Tasmania and sandstone blocks used as building stones in Port Arthur's Convict Site. These photographs record the evolution of folding of cross-beds in the sandstones to form a series of isolated, recumbent, isoclinal folds due to slumping. In these rocks there is no evidence for relative vertical movement of sediments induced by gravity inversion. This contrasts with the soft-sediment deformation in Kangaroo Island where there is considerable movement induced by gravity due to density difference.

 


Original cross-bedded sandstones, undeformed by slumping

 

cross beds cross beds
Figure 1a) Cross-bedded strata at Stapleton Beach (block). Figure 1b) Cross-bedded strata at Stapleton Beach (block).
cross beds
Figure 1c) Port Arthur's building stone, top arch of hospital entrance. Cross-bedded sandstone showing younging upwards and water flow generally to the right.

 


Incipient folding of cross-bedded strata

cross beds cross beds
Figure 2a) Cross-bedded strata, two layers of which with incipient folding towards the basin (same direction of flow that deposited the strata- to the left). The top folded layer has caused layer thickening, and thinning of the layer above indicating syn- depositional layer slumping. Figure 2b) Three layers with different stages of fold development. Bottom layer: fully developed recumbent fold with closure to the left. Middle layer: asymmetric fold pair with closure well-developed both to the left and right. Notice the truncated top. Top layer: incipient folding of cross beds.
cross beds cross beds
Figure 2c) Three layers showing different stages of fold development. Bottom layer: fully developed recumbent fold closing to the left, in the direction of flow. Top two layers detailed in Fig. 2d. Figure 2d) Details of (c) Bottom layer, incipient asymmetric folding of cross beds in the direction of flow. Top layer, asymmetric folds formed by slump in the direction of flow.
cross beds cross beds
Figure 2e) Figure 2f) .
isoclinal, recumbent fold recumbent fold
Figure 2g) Building stone on facade wall of Port Arthur's hospital. Bottom layer shows a fully developed isoclinal, recumbent fold with fold closure against the direction of flow indicated by the upper two cross-bedded layers (flow to the left). Figure 2h) Building stone on facade wall of Port Arthur's hospital. Several stages of development of syn-sedimenatary recumbent folds. Younging in this block is downwards as indicated by well-preserved cross-beds. Folds amplify to the left, and do not form a fold pair, but a single fold-closure to the left, against the direction of water flow during sedimentation of all layers (to the right). One of the layers become fully disaggregated by the slump that produced the recumbent folds becoming a homogenized black mass towards the lower left of the photograph with some mixing with the top of the layer below at the time of sedimentation (layer above in the photograph, marked with a white arrow)

 


Mature Isoclinal Folds

recumbent isoclinal recumbent isoclinal
Figure 3a) Four recumbent isoclinal fold closures to the left in different cross-bedded layers. Unfolded, think layers in between folds indicate, flow to the right. Figure 3b) Three recumbent isoclinal fold closures in different layers.
recumbent isoclinal recumbent isoclinal
Figure 3c) Two isoclinal, recumbent folds, separated by a massive sandstone layer. Figure 3d) CHANGE TO LATER Sedimentary layering truncated by erosion and renewed deposition of cross-bedded sandstone.
recumbent isoclinal recumbent isoclinal
Figure 3e) Cross-bedded layer folded and truncated by another layer with an isoclinal, recumbent fold. Both folds closures are to the right. The asymptoptic curvature of the cross-bedded layers indicates younging upwards and water flow to the left. Building stone in Port Arthur's hospital facade. Figure 3f) Same as (e) possibly even same fold in a different block. Building stone on bottom floor wall of Port Arthur's hospital.