Google analytics Link

Migmatitic Ovejeria Granite, Sierra de Quilmes, Salta Province, Argentina.

 

saddhus

Roberto Weinberg, Monash University, Australia

 

 

 


 

Migmatitic Ovejeria Granite with Garnet Neosomes:

This is a granite associated with the Famatinian Orogeny (~470Ma, age determined for other granites and migmatites in the region, Buttner et al. 2005). The Famatinian was the last major thermal event in the region and there is no evidence of another thermal peak after that (Buttner et al. 2005). In the field, the Ovejeria granite grades into diatexites, with many schollen of disrupted psammitic migmatite with garnet in leucosomes. In places, the Ovejeria granite inherits centimetric garnets from the source (found heterogeneously distributed in the granite and generally these are found in outcrops with psammite schollen containing similar garnets). These relations lead us to think that psammites were the source of the magma and that Bt-dehydration produced the melt plus peritectic garnets.

 

Looking more closely, we found that the Ovejeria Granite has regions where it is migmatitic, with Garnet-bearing neosomes such as depicted in the photos below (Fig. 2). So, it looks as if we have an anatectic granite, that has undergone remelting. If so, are we looking at the recycling of magmatic rocks within one and the same tectonothermal event (Famatinian)? These then raises questions about the thermal history of these rocks, and heat sources but first we need to determine precisely the timing of granite formation and its remelting. These features also raise questions about the melting reactions and the number of melting events undergone by the psammites. Did the psammites undergo two separate Bt-dehydration melting events? We have not been able to recognize evidence for this in the field. Could it be cryptic?

 

With regards to the relative timing of deformation and melting, we see in Fig. 4 from Puesto Quebrada, that psammites have undergone melting during deformation to produce garnet-bearing leucosomes. This deformation is the same that is recorded in the migmatitic Ovejeria granites shown in Fig. 2 and consists of thrusting to the W along a transport direction towards ~280 as recorded by stretching lineations plunging dominantly towards 100). I interprete the features to indicate that the migmatization of the psammites and the Ovejeria granite are contemporaneous with thrusting to the West. We have therefore no evidence for an earlier melting event of the psammites that could have produced the granite.

 

Are there other reasonable interpretations for these features?

 


Ovejeria granite: general features. Heterogeneous granite with disrupted psammite schollen and heterogeneously distributed clast of large pegmatitic K-feldspars and centimetric garnet (interpreted as inherited from the source). In some outcrops there are more homogeneously distributed small 1-3mm garnet grains
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 1a. Ovejeria granite: heterogeneous, with psammite schollen and clasts of disrupted pegmatite. SQ326 south of Ovejeria.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 1b. Ovejeria granite: clasts of disrupted pegmatite. SQ340 towards Puesto Salado from Ovejeria.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 1c. Ovejeria granite: heterogeneous, with blocks of disrupted granite with red K-feldspar and a Bt clot. SQ291 on Rio La Bolsa towards Puesto Tapado.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 1d. Ovejeria granite: clasts of disrupted pegmatite. SQ326 south of Ovejeria.

 


Anatectic version of the Ovejeria Granite: garnet-bearing neosomes. Features do not allow a clear determination of the timing of melting in relation to deformation: syn- or pre-kinematic anatexis are possible interpretations. Deformation recorded are typically thrust to West
Garnet neosome
Fig. 2a. Garnet neosome in Ovejeria granite. A granite which commonly borders on diatexite with numerous partly assimilated schollen of psmammite source and disrupted pegmatites, previously part of the melt source (intruded into the psammites). SQ301 Puesto Tapado: block.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 2b. Garnet neosome in Ovejeria granite. Notice asymmetric shape of leucosomes indicative of shearing. SQ301 Puesto Tapado: block.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 2c. Garnet leucosome in Ovejeria granite. Notice asymmetric shape of leucosomes indicative of shearing and the shear zone through the centre of the photograph. SQ301 Puesto Tapado: block.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 2d. Garnet neosome in Ovejeria granite. SQ301 Puesto Tapado: block.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 2e. Folded Ovejeria granite with garnet-bearing leucosomes in fold hinges. SQ344 close to Puesto Quebrada, W to the right.

 


Ovejeria granite: diatexites. These are features suggestive of a close genetic link between psammites and the granite.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 3a. Sheared garnet neosome in Ovejeria granite close to contact with psammite block. Thrust to W (top-to-right) on L=096/15. SQ345 close to Puesto Quebrada.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 3b. Ovejeria granite with garnet-bearing neosome and a schollen of psammite also with garnet leucosomes. SQ342 close to Puesto Quebrada thrust to W recorded here on L plunging gently E or W.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 3c. Ovejeria granite with garnet-bearing neosome surrounding a psammite schollen with similar garnet leucosomes. SQ340 close to Puesto Quebrada.
Garnet neosome
Fig. 3d. Ovejeria granite with garnet-bearing neosome and diggested, narrow bands of Bt-rich psammite and schlieren. Large Gnts and leucosomes preferentially in granite bands. SQ345 close to Puesto Quebrada where thrust to W was recorded on L-096/15.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 3e. Migmatite psammite, with large garnets in leucosomes. SQ358 Puesto Aguas Calientes: block.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 3f. Psammite grades into a granite and garnet leucosomes are released into and disrupted by the mobilization of the granite. Could this give rise to inherited source garnet leucosomes in the granite? No, here the leucosome is destroyed by the granite, leaving inherited garnets in granite. SQ358 Puesto Aguas Calientes: block.

 


Psammite anatexis: source of Ovejeria granite or anatexis contemporaneous with anatexis of the Ovejeria granite? The issue here is that the syn-kinematic anatectic features documented record the same deformation that is recorded by the Ovejeria granite in Fig. 2.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 4a. Migmatite looking parallel to lineation, with leucosome with garnets concentrated along the axial plane of shear folds indicating thrusting to the west (stretching lineations plunging gently to 100 or 280). Interpretation: syn-kinematic melting. Puesto Quebrada.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 4b. Migmatite looking down plunge of lineation with leucosome with garnets giving rise to stepping boudins. Interpretation: syn-kinematic melting. Puesto Quebrada.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 4c. Migmatite looking down plunge of lineation with collapse structures and some leucosomes that have an elliptical cross-section. Leucosome with garnets in collapse structures giving rise to boudins. Interpretation: syn-kinematic melting. Puesto Quebrada.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 5a. Garnet leucosome in sheared psammite. Notice rotation of garnet forming a Z inside the leucosome. Top-to-right shear sense.
Garnet leucosome
Fig. 5b. Detail of previous.